Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 6 People involved in producing a product or delivering a service

From: Evidence-informed health policy 2 – Survey of organizations that support the use of research evidence

Characteristics

Organizations producing CPGs

(n = 31)

Organizations producing HTAs

(n = 19)

Organizations producing CPGs and HTAs

(n = 45)

Organizations supporting government policymaking (n = 57)

Average number of members in a CPG or HTA development panel

1–5 full time equivalents (FTE)

17 (55%)

11 (58%)

23 (51%)

-

6–10 FTE

9 (29%)

5 (26%)

11 (24%)

-

11–15 FTE

2 (6%)

0 (0%)

5 (11%)

-

16–20 FTE

1 (3%)

1 (5%)

1 (2%)

-

> 20 FTE

2 (6%)

1 (5%)

3(7%)

-

Not reported

1 (3%)

1 (5%)

1 (2%)

-

Average number of staff involved in service delivery

< 0.5 full time equivalents (FTE)

-

-

-

8 (14%)

0.5 – 1.9 FTE

-

-

-

6 (11%)

> 2 FTE

-

-

-

37 (65%)

Types of experts/stakeholders who were always involved*

Information/library science

19 (61%)

16 (84%)

27 (60%)

29 (51%)

Clinical epidemiology

21 (68%)

14 (74%)

32 (71%)

24 (42%)

Biostatistics

3 (10%)

6 (32%)

17 (38%)

23 (40%)

Health economics

5 (16%)

10 (53%)

17 (38%)

24 (42%)

Other types of social scientists

4 (13%)

4 (21%)

12 (27%)

23 (40%)

Knowledge transfer/communications

10 (32%)

8 (42%)

21 (47%)

24 (42%)

Consumer

9 (29%)

3 (16%)

17 (38%)

15 (26%)

Other

7 (23%)

9 (47%)

13 (29%)

15 (26%)

Types of experts/stakeholders who were involved only if necessary*

Information/library science

10 (32%)

2 (11%)

13 (29%)

22 (39%)

Clinical epidemiology

8 (26%)

4 (21%)

11 (24%)

22 (39%)

Biostatistics

16 (52%)

12 (63%)

19 (42%)

26 (46%)

Health economics

15 (48%)

9 (47%)

23 (51%)

26 (46%)

Other types of social scientists

14 (45%)

15 (79%)

26 (58%)

24 (42%)

Knowledge transfer/communications

8 (26%)

8 (42%)

9 (20%)

23 (40%)

Consumer

12 (39%)

11 (58%)

11 (24%)

24 (42%)

Other

2 (6%)

4 (21%)

3 (7%)

5 (9%)

Involvement of target users in product development or service delivery

By participation in development/delivery group

25 (81%)

11 (58%)

33 (73%)

-

By survey of views/preferences

9 (29%)

2 (11%)

18 (40%)

-

By review of draft product or service model

22 (71%)

9 (47%)

32 (71%)

-

No

0 (0%)

3 (16%)

3 (7%)

 

Not reported

0 (0%)

2 (11%)

1 (2%)

-

Involvement of consumers (patients or general public) in product development or service delivery

By participation in development group

12 (39%)

3 (16%)

16 (36%)

25 (44%)

By survey of views/preferences

9 (29%)

2 (11%)

14 (31%)

31 (54%)

By review of draft guideline (or HTA)

14 (45%)

5 (26%)

23 (51%)

17 (30%)

No

10 (32%)

9 (47%)

13 (29%)

15 (26%)

Not reported

1 (3%)

2 (11%)

1 (2%)

1 (2%)

Criteria used in expert and/or target user selection*

Geographic balance

21 (68%)

7 (37%)

18 (40%)

-

Gender balance

8 (26%)

2 (11%)

8 (18%)

-

Other

18 (58%)

11 (58%)

25 (56%)

-

  1. *More than one answer was possible for the question