Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 1 A comparison of the characteristics of scoping and systematic reviews.

From: Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards

Systematic Review

Scoping Review

Focused research question with narrow parameters

Research question(s) often broad

Inclusion/exclusion usually defined at outset

Inclusion/exclusion can be developed post hoc

Quality filters often applied

Quality not an initial priority

Detailed data extraction

May or may not involve data extraction

Quantitative synthesis often performed

Synthesis more qualitative, and typically not quantitative

Formally assesses the quality of studies and generates a conclusion relating to the focused research question

Used to identify parameters and gaps in a body of literature

Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908