Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Determinants of using children’s mental health research in policymaking: variation by type of research use and phase of policy process

Original Submission
18 Sep 2020 Submitted Original manuscript
18 Oct 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Evan L. Eschliman
24 Oct 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lars H. Lindholm
25 Oct 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - siddhesh zadey
18 Dec 2020 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Purtle
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Dec 2020 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Dec 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - siddhesh zadey
27 Dec 2020 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Evan L. Eschliman
2 Jan 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lars H. Lindholm
4 Jan 2021 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Purtle
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jan 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
7 Jan 2021 Editorially accepted
19 Jan 2021 Article published 10.1186/s13012-021-01081-8

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908