Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 5 Traditional deductive CFIR approach versus rapid deductive CFIR approach: effectiveness and rigor

From: Rapid versus traditional qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)

Domain

Traditional CFIR approach

Rapid CFIR approach

Effectiveness: evaluation objectives

 Ability to identify and describe implementation determinants

Yes

Yes

 Ability to provide rapid feedback to operational partners

No (preliminary results only)

Yes

Rigor: evaluation processes

Credibility

  Analyst authority: We had analysts with expertise in both qualitative methods and the CFIR

Yes

Yes

  Data accuracy: We used two analysts/interview and maintained access to the raw data in order to verify the accuracy of data, especially quotations

Yes (transcripts and audio recordings)

Yes (audio recordings)

  Data organization: We used matrices, allowing us to parse out and synthesize data as needed

Yes

Yes

Dependability

  Data comparability: We used the same interviewers and semi-structured interview guide (based on the CFIR) to ensure data was comparable across participants and facilities

Yes

Yes

  Coding comparability: We used the same analysts and framework to ensure coding was comparable across participants and facilities

Yes

Yes

  Analysis audit trail: We documented keys phases of analysis and edits in memos and/or matrices

Yes

Yes

Confirmability

  Data triangulation: We interviewed multiple participants at each site, allowing us to triangulate data

Yes

Yes

  Team reflexivity: We held weekly meetings to discuss discrepancies and refinements to coding processes

Yes

Yes