Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Implementation Science

Fig. 2

From: Required sample size to detect mediation in 3-level implementation studies

Fig. 2

Multilevel mediation model (3-2-1). Note: The diagram presents the 3-2-1 mediation design for which statistical power was calculated in this study. The boxes signify each construct in the design and show the levels at which the construct exhibits variance: X = independent variable which varies only at level 3; M = mediator which resides at level 2 but exhibits variance at levels 2 and 3 (due to clustering); Y = outcome which resides at level 1 but exhibits variance at levels 1, 2, and 3 (due to clustering). The variance of M and Y at the higher levels of analysis are represented by ICC values. Arrows indicate effects that can be estimated through conventional multilevel regression (MVM) [32] or through multilevel structure equation modeling (MSEM) [36]. The paths that make up the indirect effect (i.e., mediation at level 3) are a3*b3. The c’3 path represents the direct effect. The b2 path is typically not of substantive interest; it represents the relationship between the within-organization component of M and within-organization component of Y

Back to article page