Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies (N=35)

From: Characteristics and impact of interventions to support healthcare providers’ compliance with guideline recommendations for breast cancer: a systematic literature review

Study characteristics

N (%)

References

Country

 Australia

1 (3%)

[47]

 Canada

3 (9%)

[36, 59, 61]

 France

12 (34%)

[38,39,40,41,42,43, 63,64,65,66,67,68]

 Italy

1 (3%)

[48]

 Netherlands

3 (9%)

[52, 62, 69]

 USA

15 (42%)

[37, 44,45,46, 49,50,51, 53,54,55,56,57,58, 60, 70]

Publication year

 2016–2021

6 (17%)

[36, 39, 44, 49, 53, 55]

 2011–2015

11 (32%)

[38, 41, 43, 48, 56, 61, 66,67,68,69,70]

 2006–2010

5 (14%)

[37, 50, 52, 59, 65]

 2001–2005

8 (23%)

[40, 42, 46, 57, 60, 62,63,64]

 < 2001

5 (14%)

[45, 47, 51, 54, 58]

Study design

 Randomized controlled trial

6 (17%)

[37, 45, 50, 51, 54, 60]

 Controlled before after study

4 (11%)

[46, 57, 58, 63]

 Non-controlled before-after study

8 (23%)

[42, 49, 53, 55, 59, 62, 65, 69]

 Prospective cohort study

1 (3%)

[70]

 Mixed-methods

1 (3%)

[36]

 Cross-sectional

3 (9%)

[44, 47, 56]

 Case study

12 (34%)

[38,39,40,41, 43, 48, 52, 61, 64, 66,67,68]

Type of guidelines‡

 Screening

7 (20%)

[36, 37, 46, 50, 54, 57, 61]

 Diagnosis

5 (14%)

[45, 51, 58,59,60]

 Treatment

9 (26%)

[38,39,40, 42, 47,48,49, 62, 63]

 Diagnosis and treatment

11 (31%)

[41, 43, 52, 56, 64,65,66,67,68,69,70]

 Surveillance/follow-up/rehabilitation

3 (9%)

[44, 53, 55]

Type of intervention

 Computerized decision support systems

12 (34%)

[38,39,40,41,42,43, 48, 64,65,66,67,68]

 Educational interventions

7 (20%)

[44, 50, 55, 57,58,59, 63]

 Multifaceted

9 (25%)

[36, 37, 46, 49, 51, 53, 54, 60, 62]

 Audit and feedback

2 (6%)

[47, 69]

 Clinical pathways

1 (3%)

[56]

 Integrated knowledge translation

1 (3%)

[61]

 Medical critiquing system

1 (3%)

[52]

 Medical home program

1 (3%)

[70]

 Provider reminders

1 (3%)

[45]

Outcomes assessed

 Intervention adoption/fidelity

2 (6%)

[36, 44]

 Impact on providers attitudes/knowledge/self-efficacy

4 (12%)

[43, 46, 50, 57]

 Impact on compliance with CPG recommendations

30 (85%)

[36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43, 45,46,47,48,49,50,51, 53,54,55,56, 58,59,60, 62, 63, 65,66,67,68,69,70]

 Impact on patient health related outcomes

0 (0%)

 Costs of implementing the interventions

1 (3%)

[44]

Risk of bias

 Low

5 (14%)

[45, 53, 54, 59, 70]

 Moderate

10 (29%)

[36, 37, 42, 44, 47, 56,57,58, 62, 63]

 High

5 (14%)

[46, 49, 50, 55, 65]

 Unclear

4 (11%)

[51, 52, 60, 69]

 Not assessed (case studies) a

11 (31%)

[38,39,40,41, 43, 48, 61, 64, 66,67,68]

  1. N number of studies. % percentage of studies
  2. aRisk of bias not assessed in studies following a case study design