Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content

Table 2 Achieved power for differences in outcomes ranging from 15 to 20%

From: Study design and protocol of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial using a practical implementation strategy as a model for hypertension-HIV integration — the MAP-IT trial

ICC

At baseline (no PF): 50%

At baseline (no PF): 40%

Difference: 15%

Odds ratio: 1.9

Difference: 20%

Odds ratio: 2.3

Difference: 15%

Odds ratio: 1.8

Difference: 20%

Odds ratio: 2.2

0.01

82%

97%

84%

98%

0.03

79%

96%

80%

96%

0.05

77%

95%

78%

96%

  1. Assume 5% two-sided type 1 error, K = 30, m = 25 (after accounting for 10% attrition, m = 28 at time of recruitment)
Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908