Predictors of the sustainability for an evidence-based eating disorder prevention program delivered by college peer educators

Table 2 Pearson Correlation Matrix and Descriptive Summary for Predictors

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9
1. TTT versus TTT + TA	1.00
2. TTT versus TTT + TA + TQ	^a	1.00
3. TTT + TA versus TTT + TA + TQ	^a	^a	1.00
4. PIAS positive, peer educator report	.04 (.785)	.21 (.189)	.16 (.299)	1.00
5. PIAS negative, peer educator report	-.02 (.883)	.00 (.983)	.03 (.866)	-.56 (< .001)	1.00
6. PIAS positive, supervisor report	-.16 (.315)	-.03 (.852)	.11 (.488)	.16 (.208)	-.01 (.949)	1.00
7. PIAS negative, supervisor report	.13 (.427)	-.01 (.993)	-.10 (.544)	-.03 (.791)	.21 (.106)	-.47 (< .001)	1.00
8. Modified Practice Attitudes Scale	.04 (.803)	-.05 (.776)	-.09 (.583)	.51 (< .001)	-.55 (< .001)	.10 (.442)	-.14 (.275)	1.00
9. PIPS number of implementation activities	.03 (.843)	.00 (1.00)	-.04 (.812)	.19 (.127)	-.01 (.951)	-.11 (.407)	.09 (.492)	.14 (.276)	1.00
Mean	0.50	0.50	0.50	4.39	2.10	4.36	2.12	2.81	4.30
SD	0.51	0.51	0.51	0.29	0.35	0.28	0.26	0.21	2.78

PIAS Provider Intervention Adoption Scale, PIPS Prevention Implementation Progress Scale. TTT coded 0 for first two contrasts and TTT + TA coded 0 for third contrast. Correlation p-values presented in parantheses
^aCannot be computed because at least one of the variables is a constant

ISSN: 1748-5908