Skip to main content

Table 3 Annotated Results of Logistic Regression Models for College-level Predictors

From: Predictors of the sustainability for an evidence-based eating disorder prevention program delivered by college peer educators

Outcomes & Predictors

B

SE

p-value

Adj. p-value

OR

95% CI

Conducted a BP groups during sustainability

 TTT versus TTT + TA

-0.54

0.77

.484

.709

0.58

0.13–2.65

 TTT versus TTT + TA + TQ

0.26

0.69

.707

.709

1.30

0.33–5.03

 TTT + TA versus TTT + TA + TQ

1.11

0.71

.118

.354

3.04

0.76–12.20

 PIAS positive, peer educator report

2.37

1.29

.065

.293

10.75

0.86–133.7

 PIAS negative, peer educator report

-0.39

0.79

.626

.709

0.68

0.15–3.20

 PIAS positive, supervisor report

0.42

1.13

.709

.709

1.53

0.17–14.03

 PIAS negative, supervisor report

-0.85

1.17

.469

.709

0.43

0.04–4.26

 Modified Practice Attitudes Scale

0.69

1.40

.624

.709

1.99

0.13–31.12

 PIPS number of implementation activities

0.43

0.13

.001

.009

1.53

1.19–1.98

Trained new peer educators during sustainability

 TTT versus TTT + TA

-1.20

0.82

.140

.210

0.30

0.06–1.48

 TTT versus TTT + TA + TQ

0.05

0.69

.942

.942

1.05

0.27–4.07

 TTT + TA versus TTT + TA + TQ

1.10

0.67

.099

.178

3.01

0.81–11.16

 PIAS positive, peer educator report

2.91

1.29

.024

.108

18.42

1.48–299.66

 PIAS negative, peer educator report

-1.43

0.82

.080

.178

0.24

0.05–1.19

 PIAS positive, supervisor report

0.38

1.09

.732

.824

1.46

0.17–12.41

 PIAS negative, supervisor report

-0.87

1.13

.441

.567

0.42

0.05–3.84

 Modified Practice Attitudes Scale

2.41

1.46

.098

.178

11.17

0.64–195.12

 PIPS number of implementation activities

0.33

0.12

.005

.045

1.39

1.10–1.74

Trained new supervisors during sustainability

 TTT versus TTT + TA

-0.35

0.95

.704

.880

0.70

0.11–4.46

 TTT versus TTT + TA + TQ

0.58

0.90

.522

.880

1.78

0.30–10.43

 TTT + TA versus TTT + TA + TQ

1.69

0.92

.066

.590

5.46

0.89–33.38

 PIAS positive, peer educator report

1.03

1.32

.436

.880

2.80

0.21–37.44

 PIAS negative, peer educator report

-0.14

0.96

.880

.880

0.87

0.13–5.67

 PIAS positive, supervisor report

1.07

1.37

.434

.880

2.93

0.20–43.26

 PIAS negative, supervisor report

-0.21

1.38

.877

.880

0.81

0.50–12.00

 Modified Practice Attitudes Scale

0.29

1.60

.854

.880

1.34

0.59–30.67

 PIPS number of implementation activities

0.17

0.13

.179

.805

1.19

0.93–1.52

  1. B unstandardized beta, SE standard error, adj. adjusted p-value, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, PIAS Provider Intervention Adoption Scale, PIPS Prevention Implementation Progress Scale. TTT coded 0 for first two contrasts and TTT + TA coded 0 for third contrast. Bolded entries show unadjusted significant predictors at p < .05
Back to article page

Implementation Science

ISSN: 1748-5908