Skip to main content

Table 6 Descriptions of criteria domains and evidence levels

From: Establishing evidence criteria for implementation strategies in the US: a Delphi study for HIV services

Criteria domains

Domains

Descriptions

Study Design

The elements of study design(s) used to evaluate a strategy, primarily the use of a comparison group and assessment before (pre) and after (post) a strategy is used

Implementation Outcomes

The effect and effect direction of deliberate and purposive actions to implement new treatments, practices, and services

Rigor & Limitations

Aspects of the study design that may limit the validity or generalizability of the results

Strategy Specification

The level of specificity about the strategy for purposes of reproducibility

Equity Impact

The impact of the strategy among target populations disproportionately impacted by the HIV epidemic

Evidence Levels

Evidence Levels

Descriptions

Non-Recommended

Strategies demonstrate a harmful effect

Strategies would not be recommended for practice or scientific investigation

Needs More Evidence

- Strategies demonstrate null results or positive results from preliminary research

Strategies would be recommended for additional research with more rigorous research designs

Promising

Strategies demonstrate positive outcomes but may be limited on some aspects of criteria domains

Strategies would be recommended to practitioners but may require careful monitoring to ensure similar outcomes

Best

Strategies demonstrate positive outcomes from rigorous research

Strategies would be recommended to practitioners for the barriers they are intended to address