Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive summary of projects developed using ItFits-toolkit

From: How is tailored implementation undertaken using a self-guided toolkit? Qualitative study of the ItFits-toolkit in the ImpleMentAll project

Module 1 – Identify goals and barriers

Module 2 – Match strategies*

Module 4 – Assess plans

ItFits completion

Target groups

End goal

Goal emphasis

Barriers

iCBT service delivery personnel (n = 25)

Patients & families (n = 3)

Both (n = 3)

Increasing uptake to the iCBT service (n = 30)

Efficiency e.g., improving the suitability of patients being referred into the service (n = 1)

Increasing referral numbers (n = 9)

Increasing therapy numbers (n = 9)

Increasing engagement (n = 10)

Raising awareness of the service (n = 2)

Increasing referral suitability (n = 1)

Acceptance (n = 15)

Appropriateness (n = 1)

Engagement (n = 2)

Resources (n = 0)

Working Processes (n = 3)

Leadership (n = 0)

Healthcare System (n = 3)

Custom (n = 7)

Educate (n = 16)

Plan (n = 5)

Quality Management (n = 3)

Finance (n = 0)

Restructure (n = 1)

Policy Context (n = 0)

Custom (n = 4)

*2 projects did not reach this stage

Using referral numbers or surveys (n = 16)

Using qualitative approach e.g., interviews (n = 1)

Fully completed (up to module 4) (n = 12)

Up to module 3 (n = 8)

  1. n number of projects registered in the toolkit
  2. Custom barriers stated by toolkit users as: request form; technological; lack of strategies and priorities (n = 3); perceived inconvenience; perceived lack of ownership
  3. Custom strategies stated by toolkit users as: ‘automatic’ (automating a process in the system); facilitate relay of clinical data to providers; assess for readiness and identify barriers; seeking advice from other iCBT providers