Skip to main content

Table 2 Domains presented by the models and evaluated in the documents selected

From: Models and frameworks for assessing the implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review

Document / Study

Model

Number of domains per model/framework

Domain

Intervention

Strategies

Context

Process

Outcomes

Fidelity / Adaptation

Sustainability

Subdimensions

  

Micro

Meso

Macro

Multi

 

Acceptability

Appropriateness

Feasibility

Adoption

Cost

Penetration

  

Bahtsevani et al. (2008) [29]

PARiHS framework

5

 

Y

Y

Y

  

Y

Y

  

Y

Y

    

Balbale et al. (2015) [30]

PARiHS framework

3

  

Y

 

Y

   

Y

       

Breimaier et al. (2015) [31]

CFIR

3

 

Y

 

Y

  

Y

Y

        

Chou et al. (2011) [32]

Goal commitment and implementation of practice guidelines framework

3

      

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

    

JBI (2020) [33]

JBI Implementation Framework; GRiP

3

  

Y

   

Y

Y

        

Jeong et al. (2015) [34]

RE-AIM framework

4

 

Y

 

Y

     

Y

 

Y

 

Y

 

Y

MSPS (2009) [35]

Guideline to identify key indicators

4

 

Y

Y

Y

Y

   

Y

  

Y

Y

   

NHMRC (1999) [36]

Not defined

4

 

Y

Y

Y

     

Y

Y

Y

    

Queensland (2022) [37]

Guideline implementation checklist

3

  

Y

Y

 

Y

     

Y

    

Quittner et al. (2020) [38]

CFIR

3

 

Y

 

Y

  

Y

Y

        

Urquhart et al. (2018) [39]

The Guideline Implementability Framework

3

 

Y

 

Y

Y

Y

Y

 

Y

       

Yinghui et al. (2022) [40]

Guideline implementation evaluation tool

3

 

Y

Y

 

Y

 

Y

         
  1. Legend: Y—Yes
  2. Acronyms: RE-AIM Reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework, PARiHS Promoting action on research implementation in health systems framework, CFIR Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, NHMRC National Health and Medical Research Council, JBI The Joanna Briggs Institute, GRiP Getting Research into Practice, MSPS Ministerio de Sanidad y Política Social