Skip to main content

Table 3 Effects on clinical practice outcomes across strata for the primary comparison (any implementation strategy vs no active intervention)a

From: Effects of implementation strategies on nursing practice and patient outcomes: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

Strata

Clinical practice outcomes (Continuous)

Clinical practice outcomes (Dichotomous)

N studies

SMD (95% CI)

I2

N studies

OR (95% CI)

I2

Study design

 Cluster randomized trials

26

0.70a

(0.45, 0.96)

90%

39

1.86a

(1.42, 2.43)

97%

 Randomized controlled trials

23

1.37a

(0.87, 1.87)

97%

8

2.90a

(1.77, 4.76)

77%

 Non-randomized studies

21

0.86a

(0.46, 1.25)

95%

10

2.54a

(1.50, 4.32)

89%

Study setting

 Hospital (inpatient or emergency department)

51

1.10a

(0.81, 1.39)

95%

33

2.14a

(1.70, 2.69)

91%

 Primary care or general practice

7

0.21

(-0.07, 0.49)

75%

8

2.00a

(1.05, 3.80)

98%

 Nursing home

6

0.15a

(0.02, 0.29)

3%

9

2.15

(0.96, 4.84)

95%

Clinical behavior targeted for change

 Counseling and advice

25

0.71a

(0.40, 1.02)

92%

9

1.54a

(1.09, 2.17)

81%

 Infection control and prevention measures

12

1.32a

(0.54, 2.09)

96%

8

1.12

(0.81, 1.54)

85%

 Assessing and diagnosing illness

13

1.85a

(1.11, 2.59)

97%

20

1.91a

(1.56, 2.34)

75%

 Coordinating care

9

1.05a

(0.28, 1.82)

95%

11

1.71a

(1.38, 2.12)

89%

  1. aDenotes a statistically significant result (i.e., two-sided p value of less than 0.05)